Jump to main content

Lecture Series of the Martin Buber Institute for Jewish Studies

History of Knowledge, Histories of Knowledges?

Premodern Jewish Epistemes and Their Contexts

Einrichtungslogo

Lecture Series: History of Knowledge, Histories of Knowledges: Premodern Jewish Epistemes and Their Contexts

The field of the history of knowledge has expanded remarkably in recent years. While earlier scholarship focused primarily on educational institutions and intellectual traditions, contemporary research examines a much wider range of knowledge production and transmission, including non-elite and indigenous cultures, practical expertise, oral traditions, and artisanal skills. This expansion has fostered new interdisciplinary fields and comparative frameworks, with scholars increasingly engaging across different cultural and methodological traditions to develop connected histories of knowledge that encompass the spectrum of elite and non-elite forms.
Recent approaches to Jewish knowledge emphasise the social and material contexts of learning, questioning traditional boundaries between scholarly and popular cultures through concepts like ‘textual communities’ and ‘communities of practice.’ Methodologically, there is growing attention to the materiality of knowledge—including manuscripts, printed books, images, objects, and spaces—alongside digital tools for data analysis and visualisation. This ‘Ringvorlesung’ series will emphasise diverse perspectives on pre-modern knowledge and learning, particularly encouraging focus on Jewish epistemic milieus in contact and conversation with non-Jewish contexts and addressing the challenges posed by varied disciplinary approaches and historiographical traditions to multiple forms and ways of knowledge-making.

Thursdays, 16:00-17:30
Philosophikum (103), Room 0.204 [S76]
Lecture series in the Studium Integrale programme: https://klips2.uni-koeln.de/co/ee/ui/ca2/app/desktop/#/slc.tm.cp/student/courses/548360?$ctx=lang=EN&$scrollTo=toc_overview

Everyone is welcome!


Programme

April 16: Zvi Kunshtat (Frankfurt), “Watch and Learn: How Clocks Transformed Ashkenazi Schooling and Synchronized Early Modern Ashkenazi Communities”

April 23: Pavel Sládek (Prague), “Early Modern Jewish Practices of Reading and Why there Was No ‘Knowledge Explosion’ among Jews”

April 30: Roni Cohen (Frankfurt), “Manuscripts, Gamblers and Medieval Hebrew Hits”

May 7: Ilona Steimann (Münster), “Books, their Makers and Owners in an Age of Migration (DFG Project): Ashkenazi Book Collections in Italy”

May 21: Simone Hallstein (Köln), “Als wir sie Brauchen müssen sollen wir reden mit den Jüden dz sie das mügen auch versteen: Die Hebräische Bibel in christlicher Polemik: Wissensaneignung Stern des Meschiah (1477) des Petrus Nigri”

June 11: Anna Rutkowski (Köln), “Vom Hebräischen ins Jiddische und zurück: Menachem Amelanders Sheyres Yisroel und die Weitergabe jüdischen historischen Wissens”

June 18: Andreas Lehnertz (Trier), “Jewish Crathspeople and Crathy Knowledge in Medieval Ashkenaz”

June 25: Magdaléna Jánošı ́ková (Amsterdam), “Odd Man Out: Jewish Physicians, Medical Writings, and the Limits of Epistemic Communities in Early Modern Europe”

July 9: Katelyn Mesler (Heidelberg), “A Dozen Lives of Perets Trabot: Rabbi, Poet, Scribe, Schoolteacher, Lexicographer (14th-16th Centuries)”

July 16: Hanna Gentili (Hamburg), “Material, Social and Cultural Contexts of Fitheenth-Century Jewish Philosophy”

July 23: Agata Paluch (Köln), “How-To Books, Practical Knowledge, and Everyday Kabbalah in Early Modern Ashkenaz”

April 16: Watch and Learn: How Clocks Transformed Ashkenazi Schooling and Synchronized Early Modern Ashkenazi Communities

Reformation and Counter-Reformation Europe fostered increasingly institutionalized school networks, often embedded in state and church structures. Early modern Ashkenazi elementary instruction, by contrast, remained decentralized: teachers worked largely on their own, often in household settings, without stable school structures or formalized institutions. Yet despite lacking centralized administration, uniform curricula, or institutional coherence, Ashkenazi schooling was not chaotic. It operated according to a different organizing principle.

From the late Middle Ages onward, instruction was routinely conceived as time that could be measured, purchased, and supervised in standardized units, often with the help of the hourglass. Even without any shared Ashkenazi governing system, communities across political borders, from France to Lithuania, converged on similar hour-based mechanisms of regulation, sustaining recognizable norms for access, payment, and acceptable conduct. The lesson-hour thus structured not only instruction but the social form of knowledge transmission. In place of institutionalization, a coherent but non-institutional, communally supervised educational order emerged, making schooling legible and comparable across the Ashkenazi world.

April 23: Early Modern Jewish Practices of Reading and Why there Was No ‘Knowledge Explosion’ among Jews

Based on quantitative and content analysis of the production of Jewish printed books between 1450 and 1625, this lecture argues that early modern Jewish culture did not experience a “knowledge explosion” comparable to that of its Christian surroundings. Although print dramatically increased textual availability and growing mobility accelerated the circulation of ideas, innovation in genres, themes, and intellectual agendas remained relatively modest. Focusing on practices of reading, study, and transmission, the lecture explores why Jewish communities adopted the printing press selectively, producing a corpus that was substantial yet deliberately limited in scope. Rather than treating this as a lack of progress, the talk examines the internal conditions that shaped Jewish knowledge: educational settings, religious authority, the social role of scholars, and early modern Jewish cultural values more broadly. It suggests that these factors together constituted a distinctive episteme – one in which print transformed access to texts without fundamentally reconfiguring the structures of learning.

April 30: Manuscripts, Gamblers and Medieval Hebrew Hits

A typical Jewish manuscript was shaped by multiple agents—scribes, book owners, and readers—who often left their mark by adding annotations, short paragraphs, literary fragments, or even doodles. In many cases, these additions were unrelated to the manuscript’s main content. Such insertions offer a rare window into the ephemeral world of oral transmission, revealing which literary pieces functioned as the “earworms” of their time.

This talk traces the transmission history of Ha-mesaḥek be-kubiya (The Gambler), a medieval Hebrew anti-gambling poem. Despite its enduring popularity in Jewish communities, the poem was never formally copied into dedicated poetry codices or anthologies. Instead, it appears in the blank pages of manuscripts, added by later book owners. The earliest known copies, dating to the fourteenth and fifteenth centuries, are found on the front and back pages of Spanish and Italian codices containing halakhic, scientific, and mystical texts—without any thematic connection to the poem itself. By examining the placement of Ha-mesaḥek be-kubiya in these manuscripts, this study sheds light on the widespread practice of inscribing short poems in the margins of textual codices, situating it within Jewish book culture as a historical phenomenon.